Up until now I have kept one starter (white 100% hydration). It's incredibly healthy and gives me reliable results most of the time (OK well I exaggerate - it's reliable when everything else is also in place)
However I realise that there are many different ways to maintain a sourdough starter - different flours/grains used in feeding, different hydrations etc. How do the differnet starters impact the flavour or character of the bread?
I presume that they each have a different balance of bacteria, yeast etc. Please tell me your experiences and opinions on the relative merits of each.
For example what would be the difference between a loaf made with rye starter and white flour versus one using a white starter and a mixture of rye and white flours in the final dough (keeping total percentages the same in both)?
If there would be a big difference, could I go some way to addressing that by using intermediate builds which introduce increasing percentages of rye? For that matter, can I permanently convert a some white starter to a rye starter...how long would it take before I can notice the results? First feed? One week? Two weeks? Or am I forever limited by the original incarnation of the starter? (In my case it actually did start off partly rye I *think*...I'm embarrassed to admit I've forgotten!)
Eek I'm asking a lot of questions!
In summary, essentially what I'm asking is: do I need to start a completely new starter for rye, WW etc. which would require maintaing several different starters at once or can I just convert part of the mother (white) starter as and when the need arises?
Thanks!
--FP
(PS my oven is out of action (read: broken) , so no baking for at least the next few days - plenty of time for me to be pondering starters!)
Eek, indeed.
Thanks David!
Yes that definitely helps clarify a few things in my mind.
Recently I've been baking most days and having the liquid starter ready to hand has been great.
What I may do is keep the white starter going as a room temperature build and refrigerate a rye and/or WW starter which I only need to refresh once a week (I've not been baking any high percentage rye breads recently).
I only keep one starter -
I only keep one starter - white at 100% and whenever I need to use specialty starter I convert it. Say, to go to rye starter I do one build with rye flour at 100%, then another to adjust hydration to the desired value, and then I start elaborating it, so usually it takes me three build to go to rye sour. Of course this requires some planning and scheduling. What helps is that I don't refrigerate my starter so it's ready to go pretty much at any moment.
There's definitely going to be some difference between bread leavened with rye starter, and bread with rye flour added to the final dough, but this is a kind of thing you have to try yourself. Try Vermont Sourdough - it has 10% rye, see what happens if you move it to the starter. If nothing else, it'd make a great discussion.
Yep
That's pretty much the same as I do at the moment.
Room temperature 100% hydration levain fed once a day. My compromise is usually an intermediate build (or three) that incorporate WW or Rye flours depending on what suits the recipe.
10% rye is what I've been working on with a little WW too. It makes a wonderful Pain de Campagne style bread which has been one of my favourite basic breads of late.
Anyway as I said earlier, I'm thinking about a refrigerated rye starter to have on stand-by should a 100% rye recipe take my fancy at any time.
But what's the point? You
But what's the point? You have to refresh it a couple times before using anyway, so it won't save you time. I used to have a refrigerated wheat/rye starter - and I just never used it.
Wow FP it's like you read my
Wow FP it's like you read my mind with this question. :) I'm really curious about this discussion for sure. Another thing I wonder is whether firmer starter will develop different flavors than a more liquid starter due to the slower fermentation.
Rudy
firmer versus more liquid starter
and different flavors... probably true Rudy, cause the more liquid one is likely to be more sour, if left to develop at room temperature. However, if you leave the final dough, made with firm starter, out to ferment a good bit longer (before retarding it in the fridge) than the one made with liquid starter, the differences would become smaller, I think.
Wish I had the time to experiment more, got a freezer full of home-made breads and have put a stop on my private bread baking activities until all of them have gone... Lucky for me baking hasn't come to a complete standstill (I would start to show withdrawal symptoms I think :-). Have to fill the orders that keep coming in... will go set up a dough for potato-bread now!
One or two starters is enough for me.
So I'm going to ditch my two ww starters because I don't think it makes that much difference, and the white starter (just flour and water) seems to be the strongest of the three. It never fails to raise the dough. And, of course, I'm holding onto my buttermilk starter because my sister loves the cinnamon swirl raisin bread I make from it, and I do love being able to eat soft white bread occasionally without having to worry about my blood sugar.