SearchUser loginBread BooksFavorite Recipes
|
Submitted by dolfs on September 6, 2007 - 3:43pm Formula issues in Leader's Local BreadsBased on a few comments in different threads here and there, and the fact that I am just starting trying to bake recipes from this book, I am also finding (potential) errors in the book. I figured it might make sense to start a separate thread where we can all exchange errors we found, and perhaps even solutions. For starters I have tried to contact Bread Alone with the message that there appear to be errors and asking for contact info for Daniel himself. I don't know why, but I am not hopeful in getting a response, but we'll see. Meanwhile in some follow up posts, I'll describe some issues that I have found so far. --dolf
Filed under:
|
Bookmark/Search this postAdvertisement |
Liquid levain, percentage discrepancy
This is an error in the %
Just a comment about the
Just a comment about the percentage to be absolutely clear. If total weight of the flour is 50grams and weight of the flour is 160 grams, than the percentage would be 100*160/50 = 320%. I am confused, what is correct right now. Is the amount of water 160g and the percentage is 320%?
I was confused
Computing starter hydration level
Yeah, right
Buckwheat levain discrepancy
This is an error in the weight
Dolfs - clarification please
Thank you for doing this - much appreciated. I want to make the buckwheat batards and just wanted to clarify so I don't make a goof. Making the buckwheat levain is as follows: 75g liquid levain (100% liquid?); 35g water; and 125 grams buckwheat flour. Correct?
Then the amount this makes requires a discard of 110g in order to use the correct amount of 125g buckwheat levain in the dough recipe. Is there any reason not to make the amount that would result in producing exactly 125g? Not trying to split hairs.
Yes, correct
dolfs, this doesn't work
I just mixed up the levain for the buckwheat batards but something is just not right. If you now use the above (supposedly corrected) amounts there is simply no way to mix in the flour. It is so very stiff it just cannot be done; like trying to mix only a few drops of water into a bucket of flour. In the text Leader says it should be a paste but no way. Maybe that is why he printed to use 300g liquid starter to make the levain into buckwheat. I don't know.
I had converted some of my firm starter to liquid this morning so it would be ready for using in the levain tonight. I ended up dumping the whole amount I made in but still feel I should dump some more water in it. I'm stumped. I'm not sure I should even attempt this recipe tomorrow.
The levain is simply a big ball of heavy clay. What to do?
My analysis
Thank you, Dolf
I think I have you name corrected now at least. :o)
Thanks for that super detailed response. It is so late forgive me if I cannot digest it all right now. In the essence of time I think I will take your advice and add more water to the final dough or I may just skip the recipe entirely. I'll make that call when I wake up tomorrow morning.
I think I ended up using 200g of 100% liquid levain instead of the 75g. I had already mixed up the firm-to-liquid conversion and later realized I should have formulated it to 130% hydration but figured that wouldn't be such a big deal to correct. Still, this hunk of levain could take an eye out if I hurled it at someone's head. :o) I'll just leave it and head to bed and see what it looks like in the morning.
I've never eaten buckwheat and have no idea what it will taste like. Not sure it is worth all this trouble. Dolf, thank you again for your kind response - I really appreciate your help.
Its getting late
Abandoning the levain
Dolf, the levain had puffed a tiny bit before I went to bed but it was so unsavory looking this morning and no puff in it at all I decided I'm not interested in putting good flour and hard work into a recipe for which I'm so unsure. I am making a note of all your notes - (you sound like Bill...hehe).
That levain doesn't even have any spring or give when touched. Note Leader says to stir it to invigorate and deflate it before applying to the dough. It can't do that since it is a heavy lump of dough. Based on the description of the dough not cleaning the bowl I think I would have to add far more water which would be fine but I just don't trust the outcome at this point.
Hey, I'm all for a challenge but this has quickly lost my interest. Darn, and they look so good in the photo.
Daniel is working on it
Dolf - so appreciated
Dolf, thanks so much for the correspondence to Daniel and please thank him on our behalf for taking time to bake this bread to test his recipe again. I do still intend to bake it so I'll be anxiously awaiting the final outcome. I baked the Genzano Country Bread a couple days ago and it was outstanding. I am looking forward to trying many more recipes from this book!
Dolf - update?
Dolf, I won't keep bugging you about this but I'm curious if you ever heard from Daniel about the buckwheat recipe test. If not, no problem, I'm sure he's very busy and will get back to you plus I have lots of other recipes on the list to try. Thanks again.
Yeah, but I forgot to mention that here
Thanks
Many thanks, dolf.
dolfS, hear anything yet?
I've got my hands on the book and after 10 min. wanted to try this recipe.... It looks interesting and the buckwheat portion seems about right to me. I have noticed that a lot of buckwheat acts like rye, no gluten, so that the levain on page 82 will not rise much. If made with the 300g of levain, it just might rise but if made with 75g I'm betting it will just form little cracks and gasses will escape without any rise. Better to go by the clock on this one and not by "double." I remember combining buckwheat with yeast and didn't get much more than a hockey puck. My instinct tells me to use 75g of levain more water and about 30g wheat flour too. For the desired effect as written on the page.
Mini Oven
The man must be busy
Leader's Buckwheat Batard
is set in my sights and I'm plowing ahead using my firm rye starter.
I'm onto the recipe (page 81) and took Bill's conversion numbers to make a liquid levain from firm starter: "You can just feed 24g with 143g of water and 100g of flour." I found this to be too dry for 130% (60g rye and 40g wheat) so I added a little water, when I was done, it came out to exactly 300g. (???) After 8 hours it has expanded a little more than one third (see page 80) so I added 35g water and 125g Buckwheat flour with no problems. (The left over 335g buckwheat levain will go to pancakes in the morning when I mix up the dough. It does seem like quite a waste but maybe the mass is important.) Will report back later with the loaf. Nighty night...
Mini O
whole spelt loaf errors, but this book is great, buy it!!
I'd hate for someone to be put off buying or baking from this wonderful book by these errors. I would say bake from the metric, to reduce your chance of hitting an error. Every bread I've made from the book is outstanding. It is a wonderful book!!
OK, here's another minor error I came across. I'm baking the Whole Spelt Loaf. There is a little inconsistency, in that the introduction states a rye sourdough and so does the ingredient chart, then later in the recipe it says a spelt sourdough. The other issue I came up against is the confusion about the number of loaves the recipe makes. It tells you to first "shape the loaf" singular, "form the dough into a pan loaf", then in the next section, it says "Let the loaveS rise until they have expanded to 1-1/2 times thier original size." I am guessing from the amount of flour that you should only be making one loaf here (?), but it could be confusing as to whether this should make one or two loaves. It doesn't give loaf pan size either.
made notes, thanks Buns of Steel
page 101 agreed, one loaf
I also noted that instead of 2 to 2 1/2 hours to ferment, took 6 1/2 hours for me and 1 to 1 1/2 hours to proof, took 3 hours. I also changed the rack position to lower instead of middle (Prepare the oven). I like the lip of my pan to be "in the middle."
I have scale down buckwheat
I have scale down buckwheat starter in order not to waste anything.
I have used 60% of starter.
As levain wass simply a big ball of heavy clay, I have added small amount of additional water, to be barely able to mix it. Similar like stiff levain, perhaps a little on dry side.
I have not reduced any water in dough.
I got great loaf. One of my favorite.
Personally I also add a zest from an organic grown orange in the dough.
Pate Fermentee discrepancy
No, this is actually correct
volkornbrot
yeah, I tried to make the volkornbrot and noticed some funny business with his percentages. i adjusted the recipe to match his percentages and I wouldn't recommend doing that. the bread was not very good- tasted very gummy. the german farmhouse rye, parisian daily bread, and pretzels have all worked out incredibly well. let me know if you hear back from daniel.
German farmhouse rye
I made the German farmhouse rye today, and I have a question for you since you have also made it. I followed the directions fairly precisely, but my loaves after baking were only about 6" in diameter. I cut a small taste (even though his directions suggest waiting until the next day to eat it!), and it tasted very good with a good chew and nice crust. I may have added a bit less yeast than called for because of his incorrect translation of grams to teaspoons. However. I may have let it rise a bit longer than was suggested too since I had to go out for a while while I was letting the loaves rise. So about how big were your loaves?
Volkornbrot ...Leader
page 293 Could not understand where 400g of sourdough starter should come from (p294) so changed the Rye sourdough recipe to German sourdough 100g, water 150g, and rye flour 150g. That makes 400g starter for the next page. Also recipe calls for 125g soaked rye berries (p294) but in preparing the berries (p 293), 125g berries absorb 175g water, should then be corrected to read 300g soaked berries.
Mini O
Leader percentages
In many sourdough-based recipes, particularly ryes, it is assumed that when your sour build has reached the same proportion as the original starter you will remove from the dough an amount equivalent to what you put in originally. Had I missed the tiny little note in Hammelman explaining this I would have had a much harder time understanding his rye bread percentages. Could something similar be happening here?
sPh
Yeast conversion discrepancy
I encountered a discrepancy in instant yeast weight-to-volume conversion when I made the Rye-Fennel Crackerbread. The formula says 1.5 t = 0.3 oz = 8 g = 2% (baker's percentage)
All of the above is correct, except the 1.5 teaspoons. Eight grams of instant yeast is closer to 2.5 teaspoons. The book consistently uses a conversion factor of 1 teaspoon = 5 grams, but the reality (and I've checked this with my scale as well as seeing it published in several places) is that instant yeast weighs just a little over 3 grams per teaspoon.
Also 2% instant yeast seems like a lot, but it is the amount called for in almost all of the book's commercial-yeasted formulas. I wonder why so much? Most of the formulas I have worked with before call for 1% or less, if it's instant.
Susanfnp
http://www.wildyeastblog.com
Good catch. I concur.
This is, indeed, possibly wrong
Contact
Spoke to Daniel. Questions are in his email box!
Good going dolf!
Glad you got through. :) Mini O
Daniel has replied
Dan Leader
Please pass along that Bread Alone is my favorite bread book. I appreciate the metric measures as it is more precise. Every loaf is perfect and the instructions are well set out.
Cheers
L
Big thanks to Daniel Leader
It's great that Daniel Leader is listening to concerns about errors and is eager to fix them. Thanks, in case you read this posting.
Rosalie
Here's another one
Today I’m baking Whole Wheat Sourdough Miche, page 118, and there is another recipe with errors.
First, I noticed while preparing the levain that the text states to “add the bread flour and whole wheat flour” when the recipe grid only contains wheat flour. You can probably assume it means only wheat flour but then you have a little voice that makes you wonder.
Then the same issue as with the buckwheat batards on page 119 where the ingredients grid states to use 225 grams of the levain but the text says to use 125 grams and store and refresh the remaining levain.
I decided to use the entire levain which oddly only amounted to 219 grams. I did weigh carefully and I have an accurate scale but for some reason that’s what it ended up to be.
When I started mixing it was clear that the water was not correct either or the text was wrong because it stated that the dough would not clean the sides of the bowl. It was a big lump of rather dry dough. So I poured in more water which I did not measure but it was close to a full cup more. Now, this could have been because he really did mean 125 grams of levain but how do we know for sure? I mixed only a couple minutes longer than the time listed and ended up with a beautiful gluten window and the dough seemed a great consistency. So I'm happy about that.
I love this book and have found some incredible recipes but these errors are very problematic. It shakes the confidence in the entire book, it feels often like someone went crazy with “cut and paste” without making the necessary revisions to a specific recipe and just plain hurried if these recipes were not simply read through and checked very carefully before publishing.
The other thing that bothers me is his always recommending a 2-quart rising container and clearly most of the recipes I’ve made simply would not fit in them. So I just don’t understand what went on with people in charge of editing this book.
Yes, but no good explanation
Dolf...answers to your questions
I used my 60% hydration starter as I always do on his stiff starter recipes. So that’s pretty close to 50% and besides I dumped in a vat more water (:o) so it would compensate, I’m sure.
My scale is always accurate because I use a 50 gram weight (that came with my pocket scale to calibrate it - same brand) to check it often.
I always use the flour Leader specifies as in most recipes it is the King Arthur Select Artisan AP. In this recipe however I did use some new whole wheat flour I’m trying from Heartland Mill in Kansas but he only said stone ground WW and didn't specify brands as in some recipes. Since it is very freshly milled that could be a reason to have it soak up more water, right? At any rate I sure did slosh more water in and really could have used more.
What I really don’t know is how the total levain ended up being 6 grams short of the 225 grams when I was so careful to double check that I measured properly.
Dolf, you know, when I made his pain au levain it also was very dry and I definitely should have added more water. Did you notice that as well when you made it?
I also find the doughs dry
and have added water. My old habit of holding back that last bit of flour when using a written recipe, holds true.
Mini O
Not dry for me... What is different for us?
Nope, not China, left Aug 30
Sitting here in my Austrian kitchen with lots of flour available. The heat is on, we're cold and rainy here. Kitchen humidity 38% which is rather low. I just think there is always little adjustments that have to be made with water or flour. If a recipe works perfect, fine, but flours do absorb at different rates so, important is to note it on the recipe and maybe mention the flour. I've seen enough recipes that give aproximate amounts. I just stick a little "+" note on the liquid.
The interesting thing about using weights, is that if the humidity is high, the flour will absorb more from the air and actually weigh more so one uses less. When humidity is low, the flour is dryer and it weighs less so one actually adds more flour. At first this may seem like it proposes a problem but in reality helps the formula in relationship to air pressure. Not worth breaking one's head about it, it just happens. Especially when open bins are involved.
Mini O
Better explanation
Note that I didn't say "super dry" but I said it was rather dry dough. What I should have said is that the WW miche was a very firm dough, which is quite different than "will not clean the sides of the bowl." There are errors in the recipe so it is hard to know what part is wrong.
In the case of the pain au levain I found no errors there, Dolf, I was only asking out of curiosity because I knew you had made it. Leader said it will form a ball of dough so I think that it was right however I just wanted to know how firm it came out for you and if I did it right or perhaps should have adjusted the hydration a little. The problem is when you find these errors it does cast doubt on other things and maybe more so for me since I’m a relatively new baker.
What I’m most concerned about is conflicting information between ingredient grids and text that we have noted. And because of those errors I think you can't always rely that the percentages are correct either.
I still love the book and I will keep baking from it. I think Leader went to an incredible amount of work to research and write this beautiful book and it still boggles the mind at how one ever gets all these important formulas correct. It took me forever just to work out properly the recipe for my aunt’s sweet dough recipe! So I definitely empathize. I just hope we get the corrections.
Response from Dan
Super dry :o)
Dolf, maybe I should have said "super firm"...hehe. But I still would attach the "super dry" to the buckwheat batards. Actually stuper dry would not even begin to decribe it since I basically had a pile of flour on my counter that was never going to turn into bread dough. :o)
I'm glad we have a good contact there to get these errors worked out. I'm baking pain de campagne again today. OMG, that bread is TDF!
Posting at the same time
Dolf, we were posting at about the same time because I just asked you about pain au levain which was super dry for me. I tripled the recipe and really needed to add more water - don't know what stopped me except I like to try and follow a recipe as written the first time I make it. The bread was fabulous though.
I am in Omaha and the temp when I made that bread (pain au levain) was probably around 68 - 70 in my kitchen at most since it was getting very cool outside especially at night. It had been raining almost daily for a couple weeks and was during that time. I'm guessing the humidity inside was around 40% or lower. I don't understand humidity so well so I might be off a little.
Again, using type 55, KAF Select Artisan for AP and KA bread flour.
Seems right
Daniel responds (sort of)
Corrections for us too?
I hope that the "list of corrections" will be available to us who already have the book. That wasn't clear.
Rosalie
Dolf - question
I have found more errors and just wanted to toss out whether it would be better for me to email those to you rather than to keep posting them here. Or I can just keep my own running list and give them to you all at once at some point. I am assuming you are keeping a list of what those are since you have had direct contact with Leader's company. I'm a little torn about this but frustrated and not sure how to best go about getting answers to the questions in these recipes or to just alert them to the errors that continue to pop up. I just don't want to appear as if we are disparaging them or piling on. Opinion?
Just send them
Flax, Sesame, and sunflower rye
Hi,
I baked twice Flax, Sesame, and sunflower rye (page 282) and always with a great satisfaction with the result, but I think that there are some typos in the recipe.
The total amount of flour is 500g. The volume of water is 22 cups and I strongly believe that it is supposed to be 2 cups, as the recipe says: soak seed in 1/2 cup, mix 1 1/2 cup water with flour.
Thus, I would adjust metric weight to 2*246g = 492 and baker's percentage to 100%.
If I missed something, please correct me. I love this bread but with this amount of water, hand kneading is very messy business (but the bread is so good that it is worth to do it).
Does anyone tried to make Classic Auvergne Dark rye from page 158? I tried that and it turned into brick, which I kind of expected, because 50% hydration seems to me not enough for this kind of bread.
Anyway, I absolutely love this book.
Thanks for answers and posted errors.
Pevnak
Pevnak's note...
I just saw this and am interested because of another error just pointed out to me on the thread where I posted about the (wonderful) Semolina Sandwich Loaf.
On that recipe's ingredient grid, page 252, the volume measure for water says 1 1/2 cups; 10.6 ounces; 300 grams; 60%. Based on the ounce and gram measurement I am assuming Leader meant the volume amount to be 1 1/4 cup.
I checked the recipe Pevnak is referencing (grid page 283) and Leader does list 22 cups - cannot be correct but I also don't think he means 2 cups either because he again lists 10.6 ounces and 300 grams for 60% water the same as in the semolina sandwich loaf recipe.
This is really off and just adds to the confusion. Once called into question, without any printed errata from Leader that I've been able to find as of yet, it makes you wonder what is truly correct in these recipes. Those are two huge discrepencies.
I still gotta say it, I love the book. I just would appreciate the courtesy of helping those of us who have purchased the book to be given answers to what is in error.
Flax, Sesame, and sunflower rye
I agree that the liquid measurements seem off for this recipe. The baker's percentage for the water is 60, which would be 300 grams, but 2 cups of water is about 472 grams. So which one is correct?
I have baked it twice and think the bread tastes great, but I am not getting a great rise and the bread seems to lose some of the rise during the baking. It does taste good, but the slices end up being small.
Are you baking 2 loaves and are they rising above the loaf pan during the proofing?
Thanks,
Manfred
I love the book too
and finally got around to reading about the search for Authentic German Ryes (p 269). So much is true and worth reading if you want to get into rye breads. I did find his mention of Cumin quite disturbing. I believe he means Caraway.
Very often a recipe will say cumin when it should read caraway because the German word for caraway is Kümmel. The German word for cumin is Kreutz, Mutter, or Roman Kümmel and so when a translation is made from Kümmel, unfortunately cumin pops up. Just pronouncing the two, one can see why there is a mix up and often thought to be the same spice. In English, caraway and cumin are two very different spices, just as Kreutzkümmel & Kümmel are different. I've run into this before.
So, Reader beware! Most references to cumin from German translations is really caraway.
Dan, if you are reading this, go chew on some cumin (or kreutz kümmel) and honestly tell me you put this into your bread!
Mini O
Cumin vs caraway
Mini - Are you saying that, for instance, in the German Farmhouse Rye that I've been planning to make, I should substitute caraway seeds for the cumin seeds? In that recipe he also lists coriander, fennel, and anise seeds so I didn't think much about the cumin seeds not being familiar with rye breads. Then I would assume this is the same for the Spiced Rye Rolls, page 289, that also calls for ground cumin seeds?
More or less, yes
I'm saying, that it is not common to put cumin into traditional German & Austrian breads.
I would taste the two, compare them and then make up your own mind. Let your own tastes be your guide. Cumin is traditionally used for Mediterranean - India for baking and other foods.
Look up this site it is a google search for brotgewürtz (bread spice) in German, then hit the "translate this page" and all the caraway has been changed to cumin. I have looked at many different packages of breadspice and checked out a site where it was a topic, "What do you put into your bread spice?" and nowhere do I find the German words for cumin.
Also look up breadbaking recipes in German, no where can I find a German recipe in German using cumin or kruetzkümmel. When translated, bang!, suddenly cumin is there and the caraway has vanished. Go figure. Try under Brotrezepte.
Mini O
Mini...
That is amazing info. Really, how would the novice of rye bread ever realize that with all those other spices in the bread. I honestly can say, since we use cumin so much in Mexican food, that I questioned it when I saw it on the ingredients list. There would be quite a difference between the two.
yes
It doesn't heip that schwartzkümmel (or black caraway) is actually black cumin when translated into English. It can also be used in bread, sparingly, has a bitter strawberry note, also a Med. spice. Clover seeds (klee) are also mentioned. I don't think Daniel Leader really ment cumin or black cumin. It would be good to know if he ment caraway.
Cumin vs. caraway
Most US rye breads use caraway seed - that is the distinctive smell and taste that almost all US ryes have and which is actually what most USians are thinking of when the say they don't like "rye". Actually they don't like caraway.
That said, I discovered by accident that whole cumin seed makes for an interesting flavor in rye bread too ;-). And I have since found several recipes that call for cumin, or a mix of caraway, cumin, anise, celery, poppy etc seeds.
Just be aware that cumin is a powerful flavor and most people consider it "hot" or "spicy". When I put it in a 2 lb loaf I use 2 tsp compared to 2 tbs of caraway.
sPh
Flavor of caraway
sphealey - You just stated why my husband thinks he doesn't like rye bread. He says he can't stand the caraway seeds! (Despite the fact that he ate a loaf I purchased a year ago last new year's day for our traditional Reuben's that very much contained them...hehe. Hey, I had only been baking bread for a couple weeks by then and certainly had not tried baking my own rye.)
Anyway, I think that is also why I feel I'm relearning the flavor of rye bread because so far in the few rye recipes I've made I don't use the caraway and you do get an entirely different flavor and I'm lucky I like it both ways - caraway or not. Thanks for the info.
(PS...We both love cumin and are not at all afraid of its strong flavor.)
I just ordered this - mistake?
How long from now is this second printing expected? I am not confident that I will be able to figure these solutions out myself, and I just ordered the book today based on the praise I've read about. Thanks!
Ask the publisher
W. W. Norton & Co of NY is the publisher. You may be able to find a contact at their website, www.wwnorton.com to ask about the second printing and, more importantly, whether it will contain corrections.
I'm disappointed that there's no addendum or other information addressing the errors at the Bread Alone website. Other bakers have noted the errors as well, such as Ye Old Bread Blogge
Comms with Daniel have gone dead!
Corrections or no?
So will there be corrections for us already-own-the-book people or not? I often am explicit in my request, like you were, dolf, and then feel that nobody tried to read my e-mail or wants to be bothered.
Rosalie
Unclear on errata: a shame
If all goes well, I will
If all goes well, I will include an 'errata' section for these persnickity (and repeated) inconsistencies.
call them what thay are errors downright mistakes.
yes i know i type like crap but to have errors like this kind in a book that is ""teaching" other people to bake. it sets up the new baker to fail and then thinking it is their fault and not the books they don't try again.
i realy dislike books such as this.
"Refreshing The Rye Sourdough" (p 278) error?
I am very frustrated by all the errors in this book. I would be even more so if I had paid for it and not simply checked it out from my local library.
If your teaching someone how to cook, your recipes MUST be accurate. It is inexcusable. Get an editor!
I'm attempting to make a spelt sourdough seed culture based on the instructions beginning on p 276. I had a couple of failures and then found Reinhart's suggestion to use pineapple juice in place of water for the first two days. I did this as well as using rye flour on the first day and everything seemed to be going well. It was very active and rising fast — especially in my tropical (Hawaii) climate.
So day four comes around and the seed culture had easily double and fallen in much less than 12 hours. I figured it was ready to refresh and start making The Whole Spelt Loaf the next day.
As per "Refreshing The Rye Sourdough" instructions on p 278, I measured 1/4 cup of my culture and stirred in 1/2 cup water and 1/2 cup spelt flour. At that point I had an inclination that something was off. It seemed much to watery -- how would it rise? We'll sure enough It did not rise. And seems to have drown and become inactive.
Having exhausted all other variables (bad flour, hard water, temp., juice for the first two days, etc.) it occurred to me that there may be an error in the recipe. I then checked the "Refreshing The Semolina Sourdough" steps on p 256 an it says 1/4 culture mixed with 1/4 cup water and 1/2 cup flour. additionally Reinhart's Barm refreshment instructions in his BBA are similar in terms or weights/%age.
Having found this thread I assume I found an error. Can someone corroborate this?
For all Mr. Leader's his romantic prose about the world of bread making it would have been nice if he'd spent even a fraction of his time actually getting the recipes right. If I had paid good money for this book I would chuck it through the window of his bakery on my next trip to NY.
End rant.
Disclaimer -- this book has the potential to be great, but went to press long before it was "proofed."
I've read through the instructions
And what I've noted is that the table on page 278 is for a starter older than 11 days and that from day 3 to 10 (previous page), a thicker mixture is used. I would keep with the thicker mixture for a while to strenghthen the starter. Your starter is now about 7 days old, so your instincts are right, it should be thicker.
Mini O
Rant on.
You have every right to be frustrated. Alas, I paid good money for the book but have no plans to visit upstate NY.
I do always recalculate his baker's percentages and read through the instructions a few times before making any attempt to bake from his book.
What's even worse than the errors is Mr. Leader's failure to acknowledge that there were errors or post a corrective addendum at his website.
Local Breads had been nominated for the 2008 James Beard Award. I am so glad the award went to Peter Reinhart's Whole Grain Breads, and not Leader. Mr. Reinhart had the courage and honesty to acknowledge there were typos in BBA, but tooks steps to publicly correct them.
Reinhart's Book
I'm not a skilled enough baker to deal with fixing Leader's errors on my own. I'll simply have to return this book and pick up Reinhart's. It's a shame, cause it seems like there's many a delicious loaf in Local Breads. Maybe V2 will be better, but I'm not sure I'll bother as I'm so disgruntled. I think Dan should step up though and get the errata published on his domain.
Great news about Peter's book. I've just requested the Library system pick it up. I'm currently delving into the BBA, but whole grains are really where my interest lies. I'm determined to make whole gain breads with a light, open crumb. It CAN be done!
Like this?
Love
John
Leader's Quintessential French Sourdough in Local Breads
Dolf,
First off, thanks for taking charge of this. It's incredibly helpful to a solitary bread making student!
After drooling and drooling over the photograph adjacent to p. 84, I made the Quintessential French Sourdough from Local Breads. Here's where I should pause for a quick footnote that because I did not have Learner's Levian on hand, and wanted to make it right away, instead I used a white flour sourdough starter that I keep (Reinhart's barm from Crust and Crumb). That starter, by the by, worked perfectly.
Back to the question at hand -- and this might be nitpicky, I concede. The formula, p. 124, creates darker bread than I'd have expected from looking at the p. 84 photo. This could also be my own judgement. Anyway, have you made the Quintessential French Sourdough, or has anyone else, and, if so, did it come out darker than you expected? What I'm wondering is if that formula contains mistakes as well?
It was great the way it came out, for the record, enough so that I'll make it again and again. But I have picked up a French sourdough at Bread Alone that was lighter and I suppose I expected this one to come out similarly. And since I typically make whole grain breads I was thinking of adding a lighter one.
I'd be much obliged for any insights you or anyone can provide!
Thanks,
TS
I did make it
Thank you kindly. Very
Thank you kindly. Very helpful, indeed. That is about the color mine turned out so all is good, though I suppose I might test out some slight changes just to see what I can come up with.
Thanks again!
I have never really had an
I have never really had an issue with formulas in Local Breads, but last week I had to chuck a loaf of bread for the first time ever, courtesy of Bread Alone. Even our local squirrels wouldn't touch it. I share some of the blame though as I knew his numbers weren't right.
Mike
Succinct list of errors
While this thread is great, I wish there were a more succinct list of errors specified by page number and/or recipe name. The discussion is useful, but in places where there is an obvious typographical error in the volume, weight or percentage, I'd really just like to know the 'correct' value. I have had good luck following the metric weights thus far.
That's Daniels job
Errors in Leader's "Local Breads"
I recently acquired a copy of "Local Breads". I'd like to thank you Dolf for your efforts in communicating many of the typos to us and to Dan. It seems that probably Dan had most of his measures correct (the metric column), but that someone without the proper spreadsheet abilities messed up several of the conversions in recipes. Some of the errors are very obvious, so it's a shame that publishers/author(s) didn't take the time to review the text before it was sent to the press. If it's true that Dan and co-workers spent the better part of thirteen years collecting and working out the recipes, I feel really bad for them that it ended up as such a rush job in the end.
I failed at my recent attempt to get a liquid levain going, so this time I'll try Leader's approach. There's the obvious discrepancy in the measurements for day 1: Well, it's anyone's guess, but since the final levain should be at roughly 130% hydration, I think I'll have a go with 160% hydration for this first day. That means 80g water for 25g each of rye and AP. It's probably not crucial for the recipe, but with this tweak, the levain will have a 140% hydration after day 3 feeding, which is not very far from the 130% that it will approach in the long run.
There's also the buckwheat dilemma: The baker's % in the levain is way off. To complicate matters, the metric column calls for a sizeable chunk of liquid levain (300 gr., which is ALL but 60 gr. of the total refreshed liquid levain following Leader's directions). In the text below, it reads "Pour 1/4 cup of your liquid levain..." You can't fit 300 gr. into 1/4 cup, so there are more typos floating around here. I've found two different blogs about the buckwheat bread from Leader: One following the volume/metric recipe (300 gr. levain) and a customized version. Both seem to turn out well, but the first one, that follows volume/metric, looks quite similar in consistency as Leader describes the levain to be ("a smooth, pasty dough").
I've never used buckwheat myself, but it's obviously not your standard fare flour. I'll have a go at this if I get the Leader levain up and running. And yes, I think it would be worthwhile to collect errors and typos in a document that we could provide to TFL'ers (since the publisher seems reluctant to do anything).
I am SO happy to have found this thread.
I am a fairly novice baker and had enjoyed reading through this book, but I believe I am encountering mixed results due to extremely frustrating editing errors. I immediately began with a stiff dough and a liquid levain on day 1, and I'm absolutely astonished that these two foundations of all other recipes do not have the correct measurements. Totally inexcusable, and it makes the book completely worthless for me.
Has anyone mastered the correct proportions for both the liquid and stiff dough levains? Would you be willing to post here? It would be a tremendous help in getting this novice on the right track.
Use weights
The only advise I can give you with regards to 'Local Breads' is to use the metric weights listed. These are the most consistent units of measure for Leader's books. I was able to get the stiff dough levain to work as described in the book. When I need liquid levain, I use a piece of stiff levain and adjust the hydration for one feeding.
General
Dolf,
I like to ask how to do spreadsheets for the dough.I do have lot's of books for excel but I do not know how to make spreadsheets.Please, help
Saintdennis
Spreadsheets - adapted rye bread recipe
Dear Saintdennis,
I appreciate this is an older post so am not sure if you are still looking for information on spreadsheets? I too am new to spreadsheets and have found the automated version provided by Duane Jardine (Sourdough Companion's 'LeadDog') useful for a beginner. It is available via this link http://oakflatsourdough.homeunix.com/index.php/2009/Spreadsheets/bakers-percentage-calculator.html. It can be simplified quite a bit for bread with fewer ingredients.
i'm sure there are more complex procedures that can be done if you are able to input and calculate everything manually. For example, you still have to work out hydration of the final dough for sourdough, given that the starter also contains flour and water. This is testing me at the moment so any help welcome! However I found Jardine's version really helped me to make sense of baker's percentages, work out formulae and percentages where they were not given, scale recipes up and down and recognize in general whether a recipe would yield a wetter or drier dough.
In following through to Jardine's own blog I also noticed that he had identified errors in the formula for Classic Auvergne Dark Rye in Leader's Local Breads and had been able to 'clean it up' in ways that made for a successful loaf. I include the link in case it is useful for others on this thread who are looking for solutions to errors in this recipe http://oakflatsourdough.homeunix.com/index.php/2009/Bread/classic-auvergne-dark-rye.html Daisy_A
Errors in Dreikornbrot recipe (Flax, sesame, sunflower rye)
I was happy to find this thread, because I was just getting ready to bake this bread and realized the recipe did not make sense.
In particular, the water called for is 60%, which he converts to 300 grams (OK), 10.6 ozs (still OK), and 22 cups (doubly wrong). I say doubly wrong because there is 1) an obvious typo, presumably 2 cups and 2) 2 cups is 16 oz. He seems to have used the flour weight to volume conversion, rather than the water weight to volume conversion, to get this.
To compound the confusion, in the written directions, the water is split into 175 grams for soaking the seeds, and the "remaining" 350 grams (300-175=350?)
So, I'm not quite sure what to do here.
Check out Pamela's bake
Have a look here: Dreikornbrot. Pamela is a Leader fan and she's baked several of his loaves with great success. I think you'll find what you're looking for in that post.
Local Bread books issues
Does anyone know if he has posted anywhere the corrections to all the formula issues in the Local Breads book? I got the book last year as a birthday gift and only tried one bread in it so far beings I got 6 books for my birthday. I really wanted Mr. Leader's book beings it deals with sourdoughs which happens to be our favorite bread medium.
Blessings,
Lydia
I'd been waiting for him to
I'd been waiting for him to post corrections before I considered buying his book and it looks like some of them are posted now. I'm not really sure how long this has been up or how complete it is of course, but at least it's a step forward.
http://www.breadalone.com/PDF/local-breads-corrections.pdf
ALL the errors?
This seems to be a very short list for what we saw. I think I found more errors than that.
Rosalie
From the file properties it
From the file properties it looks like it was first posted on October 10th, maybe we can generate some interest in emailing to the address in the document all the errors people have seen?
Re-print?
Wasn't there a re-print with errors corrected? Maybe this is just the corrections for the new edition.
Rosalie
It is incomplete...I've got
It is incomplete...I've got some too that I can e-mail Sharon.
Old World Baguette problem
Hello! I've been baking my way through this book, made the first three recipes to much success, and I think I've successfully cultivated the liquid levain. I am trying to make the Old World Baguette but have had the same problem twice: When I mix up the bread dough (150g water, 300g flour) it yeilds a VERY dry dough. When I mix in the levain after letting the dough stand for 20 minutes, there is no way to mix the two together. I get flat, gluey globs that won't absorb the levain at all. I tried to knead (by hand) for over 20 minutes, and was left with a gelatenous mess with lumps of hard flour pellets. I'm incredibly frustrated and disappointed. I've measured by volume and by weight for each. What am I doing wrong?
I couldn't find that anyone else had a similar problem in this thread.
I just mixed up the buckwheat batard dough this afternoon, hoping that it works!
thanks in advance for any help.
RE: Old World Baguette problem
Hey there... looks like no one ever responded to you about the old world baguette... you're probably not trying it anymore, but just in case...
Your fat gluey globs were perfectly normal. The dough is a mess for a long time, but trust me, you need to knead for a LONG time - I'm sure 20 minutes isn't nearly enough. Don't try to time it with a watch, it comes together when it wants to. I've taken to sloshing with my hands in the bowl until it gets somewhat sticky, then lightly oiling my counter and holding a scraper in one hand and the heel of my other hand above the mess of dough on the counter, push the dough forward, then scrape one side back. Push again, then scrape the other side. You get into a circular yin yang sort of rhythm (helps to have music on, I like Broken Social Scene, but anything you're into works :). When I feel the dough start to firm a bit more - you just notice a difference - I let it rest for a few minutes, wash my sticky hands off, take a breather. I've been letting the dough rest 2-3 times during the process, I think it helps. After a while, the dough really firms up, and it happens quite unexpectedly. You will be able to pass the window pane test with flying colors, the dough is still tacky, but smooth and like Leader says, the consistency of marshmallow. Don't stop until you really can pass the pane test - it will happen!
So far, I've gotten good, but not brilliant results with this recipe. The taste is excellent, but the first few were a bit flat, and I'm not getting the rich color I was expecting. I'm sure this has more to do with how I'm baking them than the recipe.
I'm moving on to some Reinhart recipes from his new book for now, as I think I can get better results with less work. The basic ideas seem to be similar, but stretch and fold seems to be a better way of handling the dough without beating it into a pulp.
Would love to hear if anyone got good results with this one...
I just had the exact same
I just had the exact same problem with the Old World Baguette. Thankfully I was directed to this thread. I had wondered about mixing time and speed. Leader says to mix at 4 on the KA mixer for 8-9 minutes. I wanted to go for at least 20 but had no clue if that was right or not. This book is apparently rife with erors and some may be Leader, some may be the publisher, but all of them affect us. Why in the world would Leader have asked for 8-9 minutes of mixing with such a dough? I have to believe there were too many hands working this book and not enough tresting ot proofreading. In either case it is unconscionable for a book to go to press in such poor shape.
I have to start again as the first attempt has been tossed out. Alas!
Thanks for tis input. I had suspected more mixing time but with such a short time in the recipe who would have guessed 20 minutes? Or more.
Kim
Should I send it back
Hi There
I'm new to this wonderful forum and am in a bit of a quandary over this book. I ordered it after reading good reviews and having an interest in thecontents, but then started noticing the many threads here and elsewhere regarding the errors in the book. I immediately decided that when it arrives I'd send it back, but I'm un-sure as to weather that is a hasty decision. I am a new baker so I won't at this time be paying much attention to the bakers %'s (which seems to be the main source of frustration), but I still wonder if buying this book would cause me more disappointment than good. If on the other hand the book is 90% amazingly good then should I just bite the bullet and when wanting to try a recipie search the forum first for any erros?
I think part of my reason for reacting badly is down to the inability of the author to provide a comprehensive list of known erros. Personally I find it inexcusable, but at the same time the content looks incredibly fascinating.
Not sure really, but I would be grateful for the forums advice
Best regards
Ben
Depends on your level of experience.
If you're new to bread baking, then I'd suggest you return it (or keep it (but don't bake from it) until you're more experienced).
If you have enough experience to know when something is clearly wrong (and how to adjust/fix), then it's easily a "90% amazingly good" book worth keeping. The chapter on troubleshooting is worth the price alone.
There's an errata somewhere, but I can't find a link. If I recall correctly, it's not comprehensive (and wasn't even the author's doing (his wife, maybe?)). Then again, errata sheets seldom are.
Agreed with the "it depends" comments
Having been one of the original naysayers about the book's issues, I have to say that I ultimately used it for a great many wonderful recipes in the past few years. If you have a metric scale and are able to measure by grams rather than ounces, that measurement appears to be the most reliable. Do not under any circumstances use this books' method for creating your own starter as it is shamefully inaccurate and will only be a source for frustration, but yes, the book does contain many fantastic (metric) recipes. If you don't have a metric scale, you really should either get one or return the book.