SearchUser loginRecommended BooksFavorite Recipes
|
Submitted by CountryBoy on September 3, 2007 - 5:44pm Semolina vs. DurhamI recently made Semolina loaves of Hamelman's which is roughly: Pate Fermentee or Preferment: Final dough: They came out perfectly. Except I used Bob's Red Mill Semolina flour , instead of the suggested Durham flour which is supposed to be more powdery. These loaves turned out to have a crumb that was chewy, coarse, heavy and dense. If I buy Durham flour from King Arthur's then hopefully the crumb will be light and airy? Am I correct? The point is that the bread books often make it sound as if the two flours are interchangeable but this experience suggests otherwise. Am I correct? Also Durham is not easily available at the stores.
Filed under:
|
Advertisement |
Chapiti Flour (I think) is essentially the same...
as the Durham flour that KA markets. Chapiti is easily found if you have any Indian markets in your area and yes - I've found there is a great difference between durham and semolina - semolia is much more coarse.
Trish
Chapati flour is a soft, very finely milled, whole wheat flour..
...so it is the opposite of durum flour. Chapati flour would not be suitable for the original poster's recipe.
I turned to my favorite Indian cookbook for a definition...
Semolina is milled from the endosperm of durum wheat. In my location in the US, it is always rather granular. (I have read that you can get a finely milled semolina flour in Italy.)
================
PS If you're looking for a substitute for chapati flour, you could try a whole wheat pastry flour, as long as it is finely milled (and maybe sift out some of the bran with a really fine sieve, if you're compulsive).
I have a Nutrimill grain mill which can produce very finely milled flour. I recently got some soft winter wheat to see if I could get close to chapati flour (haven't tried it yet, however, so the jury is still out on that one).