There has been discussion of having a Handbook "chapter" on rye baking. Given the current outline, it seems more appropriate to have sections on rye in several places - ingredients, methods, recipes, etc.
So, I created this topic as a place to discuss material pertaining to rye that should be in the Handbook.
David
Current content under "Rye Flour"
The current content of the "Rye Flour" topic is:
I suggest the following additions or modifications:
Have at it!
David
rye section
David, great bulleted list above on mods to this section, it is info I would be looking for as someone wanting to get into rye baking. One more suggestion is to add a bullet/section (or subsection under chemistry?) on using rye flour to create a sourdough starter from scratch (and why it is often used for this), and implications of keeping a separate rye starter in general in terms of flavor.
Great suggestion!
There should be something about using rye to create a SD starter. I assume there is or will be something on "Your first SD starter." That's where it belongs.
Hmmmm ... This brings up the question of active links in the Handbook. Takes me back to the early days of the World Wide Web, before it was graphical. When you had to log on to a CERN computer in Switzerland. Geez! I'm old!
David
Good point, mountaindog. It's
Good point, mountaindog. It's probably "much accepted sourdough-lore" that a pure rye starter is the easiest starter to get going in the first place, and the hardest starter to kill. Andrew Whitley, the author of "Bread Matters", suggests that if one is to only keep a single starter in the fridge, it should be a rye starter. He defends this by arguing how easy it is to make whatever starter you like from it.
Hi David,Looking good! Just
Hi David,
Looking good! Just a follow-up on the spoilage bit: From what I've read, it's true that rye spoils more quickly than e.g. wheat. In terms of total fat content, rye and wheat are pretty similar. What separates them is their composition of fatty acids.
As far as I know, compared to wheat, barley and oat, rye contains almost twice as much of a certain unsaturated fatty acid called linolenic acid. The greater presence of linolenic acid, makes rye flour especially prone to acceleration in rancidity compared to the other flours. I think it's often said that the specific amino acid composition of rye makes it nutritionally superior to most other flours. This is probably what's reflected in the elevated levels of unsaturated acids (which are more healthy than saturated or mono-saturated ones, right?).
Nutrition and spoilage
Hi, hansjoakim.
You have a wealth of information about rye! How about writing up a summary for the handbook?
I know just a little about the amino acid composition of proteins in rye (or in any grain, for that matter.) The "quality" of proteins, from the nutritional perspective, is judged according to whether the protein has all the "essential amino acids" required by our metabolism, and if they are in close to the ratio we require. A protein that contains all the essential amino acids is called "a complete protein."
I know of no grain protein that is complete. However, grains combined with legumes generally provide all the amino acids we require.
I'll look in the nutrition books I have for comparitive information for various grains. My guess is I'd find it more quickly on the internet, though.
There are also certain fatty acids our bodies cannot directly manufacture but which are needed for making fat. Note that "fat" includes things like myelin, the substance that encloses our nerves, not just adipose tissue. These are called "essential fatty acids," and linolenic acid is one of them. I don't know anything about differences among fatty acids in terms of ease of spoiling. I don't know much about the fatty acid composition of grains. However, to my knowledge, all the fats from grains are unsaturated.
Besides fats and proteins, grains are also an important source of certain vitamins, but these are in the bran and germ predominantly. There are differences in the vitamin composition of grains. For example, there are specific, serious nutritional deficiency diseases associated with diets largely dependent on corn (maize) and on white rice. Again, I don't know about the vitamin composition of rye compared to wheat.
Anyway, I think it would be good to have some nutritional information in the Handbook, but not TMI.
David
Hi David,Thanks for your
Hi David,
Thanks for your kind words! :)
I'm afraid I don't have the experience or energy required to take on much responsibility in this regard, but I'll be happy to contribute in discussions where I feel I can add something.
You possess wealthy knowledge about the nutritional aspects of grains, David! I got curious myself too, and did some googling. I found a book called "The Chemistry and Technology of Cereals as Food and Feed" that looks very interesting. There's not a whole lot on the specifics of rye, but the authors do mention the amino acid make-up of rye on p. 177. There's also a remark about rapid rancidity in rye at the bottom of p. 176, but they don't go into much detail. The book could possibly be a useful source for other grains in the handbook as well?
Again, thanks for your reply, David, and I admire your enthusiasm and effort in the work on the handbook.
Just make sure you find time to bake as well ;-)
Please consider the home miller in your rye chapter
A signifcant number of dedicated TFL members are also home millers.
Home millers seldom have the time, knowledge, equipment and/or patience to (re)produce commercial grades of rye flour such as...
Most home millers produce flour from the entire rye berry. However, we *may* have equipment that allows us to vary the coarseness of the resulting flour. Even when working with whole grain rye flour, there are differences in the bread when using finely milled rye flour vs (for example) the incorporation of rye grits.
Also, consider the factor of flour freshness. Posts re rye flour on TFL by home millers have consistently emphasized the taste difference of freshly milled rye flour vs purchase of commerical grades (and I've been following this for 3 yrs!).
Baking bread using home milled rye flour is a different topic from using different grades of commercially milled rye flour. However, there will be an audience who simply purchase whole grain and mill at home. Their experiences (or their questions) will, I hope, be addressed.
Good suggestions
I don't know very much about rye chemistry, so I'll have to leave that to someone else. The other suggestions are great!
But just because the book is organized one way right now, doesn't mean it can't be changed. Rye baking is significantly different from baking with wheat. I could certainly see justification for a seperate chapter on rye. All the same, I think it's probably best to include some sort of entry on rye in the ingredients section.
One thing I'll do, if it's not been done already, is correct the spoilage issue. I got a bit sloppy there.
As for home milling, I'm wondering if there ought to be a seperate section on that topic specifically. Very few bakers actually do mill their own flour (I'm one of them), so I think it's probably a special case.
Edited rye ingredient section
How rye flour is classified in the U.S. of A.
Here is my understanding:
Rye flour is classified in 2 ways - by how finely it's ground and by whether it is whole grain or not. Terminology is only marginally precise, and, in some instances, I'm not even sure it's consistant from one company to another.
The definitions below represent my current understanding. I'm not aware of ever seeing this in an authoritative source, so it should be verified with a miller or a professional baker.
Pumpernickel - Coarsely ground, whole grain rye
Rye - If not otherwise modified, is usually finely ground, whole grain *
Dark rye - Whole grain, but unspecified grind. AFAIK, the same as "Rye flour"
Light rye - Same as White rye, AFAIK.
Medium rye - Whole grain, medium grind (This is apparently different from Jeff's understanding.)
White rye - Endosperm only, generally finely ground.
Uh oh! I haven't mentioned rye flakes, rye chops, cracked rye. OMG!
If anyone else has better information, I'd sure like to have it.
David
* There is a very useful term used in the categorization of psychiatric disorders: "Not otherwise specified," commonly spoken as "N-O-S." For example, "Anxiety Disorder, NOS." There is a lot of "Flour, NOS" found in stores.
Hamelman on rye classifications in the U.S.
David,
FWIW, here's what Hamelman says on p. 48 of my copy of Bread.
Thanks!
There you go!
I'd only read that page 4 or 5 times, probably. I'll try to read it again when fully rested and cafeinated. It might sink in under optimal conditions.
Well then, I'd include that material, but in bulleted list rather than narrative. Hmmm ... Should this kind of material be in the glossary?
David
rye flour
David,
The way I see it, there are so few kinds of rye flour that can be found on store shelves that it is easier to mention them specifically.
AFAIK?
translation...
Betty
Betty - I think it means: As
Betty - I think it means: As Far As I Know
I'm like you, I am out of the loop on most text messaging shorthand (we still don't have cell service where I live), but sometimes I can decipher it :-)
TY MD..
usually I can figure it out..Thanks
Betty
the book
Quite correct. We can shuffle things around as we feel the need to.
David's ideas to expand out the rye flour page and add special content on mixing and kneading rye doughs sound great.
In the recipe section, it may make sense to add subsections. I've thought of dividing recipes along the lines of Yeasted and Naturally Leavened, and then within those splitting out Sweetened Doughs, All Purpose, Rustic Breads, Whole Wheat, Rye, Multi-Grain, Pizzas and Flat Breads, those sorts of things. But, as Jeff says, we can arrange things one way and, if they don't make sense, shuffle them around another way.
I also agree with Jeff that home milling is important but rare, and that a special section or chapter that addresses milling is probably the way to go.
Sticking to rye ...
Which anyone who has hand kneaded rye knows is not difficult ... If there are any unique considerations in home milling rye, or other grains for that matter, they should be documented.
David
Home milling rye
I home-mill my rye flour, and I've not noticed any special considerations in handling, compared to store-bought rye. I have, however, noticed that fresh rye tastes considerably better than store-bought ... to me, anyway. But I suspect that's too subjective to state as fact in the ingredient section, and could be better incorporated into the home milling section.
Also, I can't get coarse rye flour from my mill, but that's not specific to rye. It's a micronizer, so the grades are essentially fine, very fine, and super-duper unbelievably powder-like fine.
I've never made pumpernickel bread (the German kind that uses no wheat flour and has big chunks of cracked rye as well) as a consequence. Which is kind of sad.
Anyone else notice any differences in handling home-milled rye?
I grind my rye
I use a Nutrimill to grind my rye. I think I might have sifted it once for a lighter rye but otherwise I used it as is. I think the taste makes it worth the cost of the mill. I remember years ago the health food stores kept whole grain flours in a refridgerator, I don't see that anymore. Rye goes rancid faster than wheat and I always wondered how old the flour was off the shelf. Most bags are dated these days but I still prefer the taste of the home milled.
I've tried most of the ryes posted here and used the rye I milled close to the "fine" setting. I'm happy with the results. When I want to do the least work with a rye, I make a no-knead rye and bake it in a covered Le Creuset. Always great.
This is going to be a great "Book". Thanks to all of you who are working on this.
Videos?
Very interesting topic. Thanks to David for opening this thread and everybody else who contributed.
A couple of weeks ago I went looking on the internets for video of mixing, kneading, shaping, scoring, baking rye bread. (I did this after trying, unsuccessfully, to find such visual material on TFL first, of course.) There's precious little, and what is there seems to me to be of minimal value to artisinal bakers, which brings me to a suggestion:
I think we would do a great service for lots of baking folks if we had videos (of the quality of Mark's backhomebakery material) of the various stages of making (various kinds of) rye bread. I especially would direct this to those TFL bakers who are already expert on the subject. I know this isn't easy, but a moving picture is worth a million words.
David
Bread Videos
Don't forget these from France:
http://lepetitboulanger.com/
Bob
Exciting!
It looks like it's going to be a good "book"!
Rosalie
Draft: Expanded rye section
For your consideration ...
I am now going to heed the wise words of hansjoakim. I am not going to work on this any more this weekend. I am going to bake some bread. And make sourdough waffles!
Comments? Questions? Witty remarks?
David
Addendum: I went ahead and edited the Rye Flour Handbook entry with the above material. I hope that's okay. <ducking in anticipation of thrown objects>
dms
This looks brilliant, David.
This looks brilliant, David. Very nice job putting all these pieces together in a single document. I like how you communicate the many subtle properties of rye in a very clear and fluent manner!
I did a Google image search and found the following scan from what appears to be a Danish textbook on baking: http://home20.inet.tele.dk/desdemona/misc/acid.png. I'm not sure if you think it's worth including, but at least it illustrates the resulting bread crumb in rye breads that are not sufficiently acidified. This shows how severely enzymes will affect the crumb during baking if they're not slowed down by lowering the pH. It's quite remarkable that gelatinization of the crumb in rye (53 - 64 degC) and wheat breads (63 - 79 degC) only differ by some degrees centigrade, yet this difference is so important when the bread is baked. Doughs containing more than 20% rye should be acidified! By the way, it could make for an interesting experiment to bake two rye breads side by side, one with sourdough included and the other without it (just rye, water, salt and commercial yeast). The loaf without sourdough would probably have a sticky crumb with large cracks near the top... Anyone up for it?? ;-)
Norway, where I come from, doesn't have the strong rye traditions that say Sweden, Finland, Denmark or Germany have. Many of the older, Norwegian baking books I've looked into on rye baking, have used various dairy products (e.g. yoghurt or buttermilk (translation?)) in combination with commercial yeast to produce rye loaves. This produces a satisfactory crumb, but many of the other benefits that stems from using a proper sour are not present in the final loaf (e.g. the nutritional benefits you mention, David).
Again, a great write-up, David!
Thanks, hansjoakim!
I'll look at the link you provided. At least for my own education.
It is hard to know where to stop when writing for an audience with such a range of experience and interest in a topic. I didn't want to give so much that it would scare off those thinking about baking rye bread for the first time.
Where additional, more detailed, information is available online, perhaps links can be appended to the section. Hmmm ... Sounds like a good idea to me.
David
Scope/audience for the handbook
I've read somewhere on the pages that outline the purpose of the handbook, that the document aims at being an "open source version of BBA". First of all, is this correct, or have I misunderstood the scope and purpose of the handbook?
I'm asking because I think that the handbook could be of greater value if the ambitions were slightly loftier! I have the impression that most of the loafers around these parts already have a bread baking book or two in their arsenal, and the last thing they need is "just another BBA". At least to me, lots of the topics under current discussion at TFL are at very advanced levels (which is tremendous and the reason that I keep returning to the site - to learn something new and read other bakers' experiences and experiments). Many of the threads are extensions of topics only touched upon in books like BBA. So, wouldn't it be more interesting/worthwhile to try to absorb content from such topics into a handbook? The recent discussion about sourdough and lactobacilli is just one of those threads that would make for extraordinary content, perhaps making for a handbook that could "bridge the gap" between the standardized home bread baking books and the cutting edge, scientific work that's going on? Another highly useful part of the handbook could be "Suggested further reading" (or similar) after each section, where links to textbooks, research papers etc. can be given.
I apologize for being a bit incoherent, but coming back to my first question: Is it really such a good idea to limit the scope of the book to BBA level of bread baking theory and techniques? If the audience of the handbook is mainly first-time bakers, then I certainly agree that this would be the correct level of detail. My impression is just that "another BBA" is not what the world needs now (at least not a handbook that runs the risk of being a "plagiarization" of BBA or Bread). There are some extraordinarily refined bakers at this site, that posess astonishing baking skills and baking knowledge. Why not try to exploit this in a handbook? Aren't there enough resources for the beginning baker already out there?
Nice work, David!
Nice work, David!
You've covered the subject admirably, plus it's fun to read.
You've earned those waffles!
David
Thanks Soundman (David)!
Fried eggs with rye toast and cinnamon buns for breakfast this morning. But, now that I've earned them, SD waffles tomorrow for sure.
David
Sometimes so slow....
So this is where the action is? Great write up David! I just now noticed the HANDBOOK in the tool bar after it was mentioned. My computer was in the shop if anyone was wondering...
I'm not throwing any dough balls yet.... let me re-read it. So far it make sense. I like the explainations of things. I doesn't get boggled down in detail that might turn a new baker away from baking, just includes the major cosiderations of rye and why it behaves the way it does. I didn't know this information years ago. I just worked with rye the hard way, trial and error, until it worked. This can be very discouraging without knowing the basics. Good information is good economics, less wasted flour! Good for the personal learning curve too!
Mini
Thanks, Mini!
You're one of my rye gurus, so your positive comments mean a lot to me.
The Handbook is meant to be a collective effort, so please contribute. You have so much knowledge and experience that would help others on their "personal learning curves."
David
I really appreciated the content..
You covered a huge amount of information in a light, concise style. Easy to read, understand and covered all the basics.
Nice job..as always
Betty
You're going to love those waffles. Try the batter for pancakes too!
Thanks, Betty!
I appreciate the feedback.
I'm really looking forward to the waffles. I have my starter refreshed and a quart of buttermilk in the fridge. I just have to decide which recipe to try first!
I've made SD pancakes a few times using AnnieT's recipe. I loved them, but I like waffles better than pancakes.
David
handbook
More could be added to mixing and dough development. Especially about the relationship of mixing to crumb size, how the mixing influences it.
Wet mixing adding only half the flour to a recipe. Making it smooth and then slowly adding the rest of the flour is essential to fine crumb. It's an old method but still desired.
Mixing eveything together at once and just enough to develop the gluten, creates the large open crumb.
Flour 2-step
As opposed to the Texas 2-step.
Hi, Mini.
Any thoughts about the 2-step flour addition that SteveB is playing with, in light of your suggestion?
David