The Fresh Loaf

A Community of Amateur Bakers and Artisan Bread Enthusiasts.

Most bookmarked

loaflove's picture
loaflove

My lame is lame

Hi there!

I bought a lame with a long wood handle and I'm thinking I need something that doesn't have a handle.  I'm still not getting the ear I want.  Can someone tell me if the UFO lame is a trademark?  Or are there knock offs? And are the knock offs just as good?  There seems to be several on amazon that is name "UFO". 

The Roadside Pie King's picture
The Roadside Pi...

Panettone Redux

I bind you from...

Oh, sorry, wrong kind of binding! Smile. This will be my last vacation week project. It's a three-day behemoth! Stay tuned for updates.

 

newloafer's picture
newloafer

Ankarsrum and Le Creuset 7.25 Dutch oven for sale

I have found that I rarely use my Ankarsrum (crème color) mixer. It is overkill for what I need. I have used it maybe 5 times since I purchased it a year ago. I am also selling a Le Creuset Dutch Oven (blue with stainless steel knob). I bought this with the intention of cooking sourdough in it, but it was so expensive that I didn’t want to risk crazing so I bought a cheaper Cuisinart Dutch oven for that instead. I’ve only used the Le Creuset on the stove top. I’m asking $420 for the mixer (it has all of the original parts including the batter bowl, cookie paddles, whips, steel dough bowl, roller, and dough hook). And 250 for the Dutch oven (400 asking price for the mixer and 230 for the oven, additional 20 added for shipping). I will post pictures as soon as I figure out how to do so. The Ankarsrum is in like new condition, will be happy to FaceTime or record a video of it in action. The Le Creuset is also in pristine condition except for a slight discoloration near the bottom of the interior (small 3 inch long by half inch tall), it’s almost unnoticeable. Again, will post pictures as soon as I can. The enamel is not cracked or damaged in any way. It was hand washed every time and dried immediately. I have receipts from Pleasant Hill Grain and Williams Sonoma to show that I am the original owner, date of purchase, and that they were purchased brand new. Don’t hesitate to ask for any deatails I might have forgotten to add here. Thanks! 

PANEMetCIRCENSES's picture
PANEMetCIRCENSES

Pan bread made with spelt-FLAS

This time I prepared 'flas' using spelt malt (by BestMalz) instead of the usual rye (just trying different malts):

 Yield: 419g, color: beige (rye turns out darker brown/caramel), taste: less green-apple (rye) and more earthy/wheaty, pH: same as rye 3.6-3.8

 

Bread Formula

200   flour   (bread 13-14%)

90     water

60     spelt flas

1.6    instant dry yeast

4       salt

+

15    wheat bran (soaked in the fridge ~24 hours and strained just before use)

 

Timeline

0000   Mix all ingredients together using stand mixer for 4-6 min (start of bulk - DDT 28C|82F)

0030   Laminate

0100   Roll&Fold (no excessive streching required) in basin where dough rests

0130   Shape and place in 1Lt Pan (start of proof - Brod&Taylor setting 35C|95F no humidity disk as in bulk)

0230   Bake (3 min at 250C|482F for spring, then covered at 200C|392F for 57 min)

 

 

Conclusion

Rye and spelt malts are interchangeable with no great differences in the end result. Maybe spelt gives a more wheaty-warm sense in taste than rye and a tad less of a sourness.

 

 

albacore's picture
albacore

Precision Bassinage

;The current consensus is that, when using a mixer, bassinage should be added in a trickle so that the dough stays cohesive and doesn't spread out and "squelch".

So I started adding it with a squeezy dropper bottle. This worked well but was a bit tedious, especially when there was a lot to add.

Then I thought "what I need is a little peristaltic pump". So here it is: a 12 volt pump that will run on 6 - 12v with a 1*3 tube. It came with a 2*4 tube, but that was a bit fast so I changed the tube - pretty easy to do.

It's just at the prototype stage at the moment, but results are promising.

Flowrate is 9 - 27ml/min.

My test dough used a stiff (45% hydration) levain, so I needed quite a bit of bassinage - 100ml.

 

 

 

And this was the resulting bread:

 

 

Crumb was a bit open, even by my standards!

 

 

Lance

 

The Roadside Pie King's picture
The Roadside Pi...

Take the time do it right. We can do it, baby!

I am going to give this bad boy some more time to rest before the final stretch. 

20-minute rest after bulk, and preliminary rough shaping. Now 20 minutes after the preshaping. 

Naturally Levian Semolina Falzon - Filone.

hominamad's picture
hominamad

Analysis of my toasted buckwheat porridge loaf

Hi everyone - I recently made this bread, which I believe I first read about on this forum:

https://breadtopia.com/toasted-buckwheat-porridge-sourdough-bread/

Wanted to share my experience and see if anyone has any tips. First, I am a pretty experience sourdough baker at this point, but have mostly stuck to traditional country-style loaves, like Tartine, FWSY, etc. For the last year, I've almost exclusively been making the Country Blonde and Field Blend #2 from FWSY, and have it down pretty good. The "craziest" I've gotten is adding cranberries and nuts to my loaves, and sometimes sesame seeds, and I wanted to try something different - so went for this buckwheat porridge loaf.

Overall, I guess it was sort of a success, in that it tasted great and had a wonderful crust - but it was a bit more dense than I would have liked. This was also my first time baking a sourdough in a loaf pan, but I did that more because of some issues I ran into. Here's some points from my bake, and some questions. Curious to hear what people say about these.

- The recipe just called for adding 80g of starter. I wasn't sure if that meant a recently fed starter, a levain or what. So I ended up preparing a levain in the morning, using the same ratios as FWSY Country Blonde (4:4:1:1, white flour:water:ww flour:starter) . I prepped the levain at around 9am, and mixed my dough around 5pm - it seemed pretty active then - but maybe not as much as if I would have added a starter directly in, maybe fed the night before?

- After 2 hours of folding, the dough wasn't as active as I expected. Especially after folding in the soaked buckwheat. Also, the dough became extremely wet after adding the buckwheat - even though I had drained it as thoroughly as I could.

- The recipe said the dough should double - I waited until around 11:30pm (72 deg kitchen) and it didn't seem to change that much. I had to go to bed by then, so I turned it out, did a pre-shape, and let it rest 30 min. The dough was so wet it was almost completely unshapeable.  My main question here is, I wonder if this is b/c of the moisture from the buckwheat, or maybe it was actually overproofed by then?

- I did the best I could for shaping, but didn't want to risk having it completely stick to a proofing basket, so I just oiled up a loaf pan and put it in there for the night in the fridge.

- Next morning, took loaf out of fridge. Didn't look any different than the night before. Does this mean anything?

- I baked it up, and ended up with what you see below. I ended up putting the whole loaf pan into my dutch oven to try to get some steam for the first half of the bake - not sure how much this did.

Like I said, it tasted great, and texture was good too - but a bit dense. One aspect I really loved about this bread, was that the buckwheat around the outside got really crunchy when baked, giving it a sort of nutty-crunchy texture which I loved.I want to make this again, not sure what to do differently next time. Any tips would be much appreciated!

 

happycat's picture
happycat

Choc cakes with molten citrus ganache centres

Inspiration

Lava cakes seem to be trendy for Valentine's day. This is more of a little chocolate cake with a slightly crisp shell and molten (but not flowing) orange citrus chocolate ganache centre. 

These cakes are mostly chocolate... so I wouldn't rely on chips for the cake or Lindor fillings to replace the ganache as suggested in the original. Blech! Give me deep chocolate, real vanilla and real orange!

The recipe was inspired from https://www.recipetineats.com/molten-chocolate-cakes/comment-page-2/#wprm-recipe-container-57946

With the following differences:

  • I used unsweetened chocolate and added 40% sugar (she used chips with a lower cocoa % to help with flow of the centre)
  • I used the stovetop to make ganache, not a microwave and choc chips
  • I added orange zest and vanilla bean to the ganache
  • I used cake flour

Ingredients

MOLTEN CHOCOLATE GANACHE CENTRE:

  • 60g unsweetened chocolate chopped into bits
  • 40g sugar for chocolate
  • 60g heavy cream (eg. 35% whipping cream)
  • 1 vanilla bean
  • zest 1 small orange

NOTE: I should mention that you won't use all this ganache. The original recipe made too much and so does this. The amount you put in each cake is up to your judgment but I had plenty (half?) left over.

CAKE BATTER:

  • 120g unsweetened chocolate chopped into bits
  • 80g sugar for chocolate
  • 100g unsalted butter 1cm cubes
  • 1 vanilla bean
  • 2 eggs room temperature
  • 2 egg yolks room temperature
  • 100g caster sugar for cake (or just food process regular sugar)
  • 16g cake flour

Instructions

GANACHE: 

  • in a saucepan, add cream, sugar, vanilla and zest and mix thoroughly
  • NOTE: consider food processing zest into sugar to enhance flavour
  • warm on stove medium, stirring regularly, until just starts to bubble
  • remove from heat and add small amount of chopped chocolate and stir until melted in
  • alternate warming, adding bits of chocolate, stirring until all smoothly integrated
  • Cool 10 minutes
  • refrigerate until firm enough to scoop

CAKE:

  • Preheat oven 390°F
  • Grease & dust moulds with cocoa, tapping out excess
  • in a saucepan, add butter, chocolate's sugar, stirring until integrated
  • warm on stove medium, stirring regularly, until just starts to bubble
  • remove from heat and add vanilla
  • add small amount of chopped chocolate and stir until melted in
  • alternate warming, adding bits of chocolate, stirring until all smoothly integrated
  • put aside to cool
  • In a bowl, whisk eggs, egg yolks and the cake sugar (I food processed it with old vanilla pods then sifted them out)
  • Add portion of melted chocolate into the eggs, mixing until combined, repeating until all integrated
  • Sift flour over batter and fold until just combined
  • Fill 7-8 muffin moulds ⅓ with batter
  • Place blob ganache into middle of each batter
  • Cover each with more batter until 1 cm from top
  • Bake 17 minutes 
    • I baked mine in a floppy silicone mould on a thin aluminum sheet and after 17 minutes I added another 3 without the sheet. This may be why I got the slightly crispy shells, which I liked

Some Photos

Chocolate chips are not a good substitute for baking chocolate. This is a mostly chocolate dessert... so start with real all-cocoa / cocoa butter chocolate without the extra sugar, wax, stabilizers, flavourings and whatnot of chips...

Here I've plopped a blob of glorious ganache into a pool of batter in 8 muffin cups. Then I topped it off with more batter and baked.

Look at how dark that chocolate is....

 And they baked up nicely...

Results

The cakes had a wonderful chocolate aroma, deep chocolate flavour, a slightly crispy shell and a molten chocolate interior with a lovely and nuanced natural orange essence from zest. The whole thing is mostly chocolate so it was pretty great because I took the time to make it with quality ingredients.

To serve, we microwave the cakes to melt the ganache. Yes, the shell stays a bit crispy.

I froze my cakes to portion them out over time. These are small but very satisfying.

 

Crummy photo... 

JonJ's picture
JonJ

Bassinage of an Italian flour that turns to soup

So this morning I was mixing in levain with an Italian flour - https://granoro.it/le-linee-granoro/farine-e-preparati/ - the light green bag "per pizza" - soft wheat - type 0 - W250 - 10.7% protein.

Have had similar happen before with Italian flours in my kitchen where they have turned to "soup", however, this morning I kept my wits about me and watched closely what happened, and would love some insight from the experts here about what is going on.

In the mixer, on slow speed, on the dough hook, I was combining a dough with a yeast water levain made with the same flour. The main dough had also had about 1 hour of autolyse time, so both doughs were already well developed. Both doughs were not over-hydrated  - the autolysed dough was at 55% hydration and the levain at 65% hydration. The levain did have the same flour, but the flour mix was 78% granola and 22% hard red wholemeal that is fairly fine. I was just trying to combine in the levain really. Ran the mixer for about 4 minutes and all was well, the dough was pretty tight but to my eyes it didn't look like much had happened - it was clinging to the hook for all of those 4 minutes, the sides of the bowl were clean, and the doughs may (or may not!) have been mixed together by this mixing action.

Then I thought I'd add a small amount of water, a very small amount of water mind you, just to help the dough mix and to assist with eventually adding the salt grains. So, I added about 4g, the dough did the 'whoomp whoomp' sound, fell off the dough hook, swirled around a bit in the layer of 'muddy' dough you get and then started to cohere again on the dough hook, all took about 30 seconds. But then I added another 4g of water and it was at this point that things went wrong. The dough did not cohere again, rather it started puddling worse and worse, I let it run for a total of 2 minutes but those 2 minutes were enough to turn the dough into the soup. I tried adding the salt then, but it did nothing to tighten this dough (as it does with other doughs).

It's interesting that this happened on a slow mixer speed with a fairly low hydration - 60% overall - and a fairly low amount of bassinage water - 8g.  So my question is, in general is bassinage in a stand mixer like this an inherently bad thing? Should bassinage always be done by hand, or not at all? Or is it that the doughs were already fairly well developed and shouldn't have been in the mixer, or were too well developed for bassinage? Can a flour exceed its ability to hold water at such a low hydration with such a small amount of bassinage? The soupy dough 'runs' - it pours. It looks like it has lost the gluten that it had. In the past I've baked with it in loaf tins but it really doesn't produce a nice bread once it has broken like this.

Brotaniker's picture
Brotaniker

Bulk Proof Basics - when is "ready"?

Right now I am testing some 1-step (no preferment) recipes at room temperature and I wonder how I know when the time is right?

I tried a baguette type white dough. Let it proof for about 8 hours and it increased in volume. But I have no idea if it was too soon or too late. I am aware that temperature, amount of starter and time play a role.

I let my starter (a stiff 50% starter) raises about 100% when I feed it. Bread is about 60% hydration. In the dough I add about 15% starter.

Is there is percentage in volume increase that tells me "time to start"?

I would then do some type of video recording find the sweet spot.

 

 

 

 

Pages